Student Study Guide
This study guide is intended for small groups and short seminars to introduce the view of sacraments as held by Presbyterians and other branches of the reformed movement. This explains why references are made to the Westminster Confession, not as grounds of authority but for historical reference and clarity.
Ample blank spaces exist for the students to take notes.
Lesson One: Rules of interpretation
Lesson Two: The Covenant of Grace
Lesson Three: Baptism, meaning and mode
Lesson Four: The LordÕs Supper
Lesson Five: Secondary Issues
Certain rules of interpretation become especially important in the study of the sacraments. The reason is the biblical data is often a part of a discourse on other subjects.
1. Unity of scripture
2. Validity of inferential logic
3. Cross-referencing is necessary
4. The principle of clarity.
5. The singularity of interpretation.
Extracts from Chapter 1- Of the Holy Scriptures
Rules of Interpretation (Hermeneutics)
ÒThe whole
counsel of God concerning all things necessary for His own glory, man's
salvation, faith and life, is either expressly set down in Scripture, or by
good and necessary consequence may be deduced from Scripture:Ó Chapter 1, Article 6
Example: Seeing a man walking down the beach is a direct
observation and counts as eye witness evidence. Seeing the footprints in the
sand of a man is an indirect observation from which we infer that a man was walking on the beach.
Example: We do not need an example of women taking
communion. We only need to ask if the whole congregation participates and if
women are members. This establishes the fact, with no need of examples.
ÒAll things in
Scripture are not alike plain in themselves, nor alike clear unto all: yet those things which are necessary to
be known, believed, and observed for salvation are so clearly propounded, and
opened in some place of Scripture or other, that not only the learned, but the
unlearned, in a due use of the ordinary means, may attain unto a sufficient
understanding of them.Ó Chapter 1, Article 7: Westminster Confession, 1648
ÒThe infallible
rule of interpretation of Scripture is the Scripture itself: and therefore,
when there is a question about the true and full sense of any Scripture (which
is not manifold, but one), it must be searched and known by other places that
speak more clearly. Chapter 1, Article 10 Westminster Confession, 1648
ÒÉfull sense
of any Scripture (which is not manifold, but one)Ò WCF Chapter 1
Article 11
1. When a theology question is not Òclearly propoundedÓ in the Bible, what recourse do we have for knowing what is the correct doctrine? ________________________________________ [1]
3. What should we do when a biblical text does not seem to deal fully with a doctrinal question? ______________________________ [1]
4. The infallible rule for interpreting the Bible is ______________ [2]
5. What is the view of the Westminster Confession with regard to various interpretations of a text? __________________________ [3]
Gen.17&Gal.3
á Elements of a covenant
á
The meaning of Sacraments
For teaching this section, you need only follow certain portions in Smalling's thesis on baptism.
Three factors must be established in the mind of the students before they can fully grasp the full picture of the meaning and mode of baptism:
1. The continuity of the covenant of Abraham as the Christian covenant.
Compare Gen.17 with Gal.3. Show that the ChristianÕs covenant is the Abrahamic covenant fulfilled.
2. Circumcision as the sign and seal of that covenant. A good text for this is Rom.4:11
3. The replacement of circumcision by baptism. Use Col. 2:11-12 for this.
A very effective way to establish sprinkling or pouring as the biblical mode of baptism is the following group exercise. Let the students come to their own conclusions.
1. ÀWhat does water symbolize in the Bible?
Mt.3:11; Jn.1:13; 7:38-39; Acts 1:5; 11:15-16 _________________ [2]
Ez.36:25; Mt.27:24; Jn.13:5; Ef.5:26;
Heb.10:22 _______________
2. By what mode does God apply the person or thing that the
water symbolizes?
Ez. 36:25-28; Tit.3:5-7; Acts 1:5,8; Acts 10:44,47; Acts 11:15-16
______________________________________ [3]
Two questions to answer in the LordÕs Supper
á
Where is Christ in it? The doctrine of the Real Presence.
á How is grace communicated through it, if at all?
CATHOLIC
The grace operating in the LordÕs Supper is saving grace. The rite operates by its own power. Christ is present because the elements are changed into the very flesh and blood of Christ. This doctrine is called Transubstantiation. It means the elements are transformed into the substance of Christ.
ZWINGLIAN VIEW (Held by Baptists and many other evangelicals) [4]
No grace is operating at all. It is a symbolic and instructive rite oily. It is just an ordinance and memorial. Christ is not present in any sense whatsoever.
LUTHERAN
Grace is in Christ, who is in, around and through the
elements. Grace is automatically operative in believers who do not resist it.
PRESBITERIAN AND REFORMED
An encouraging and preserving grace is operative but not a saving grace in the sense of provoking regeneration. It operates through the faith of the believer by the Holy Spirit. No power or grace is found in the elements themselves. Christ is present in the believer, not in the elements presented. It is three things: An ordinance, a memorial and communion. By communion it is meant that there is a real spiritual connection with the spirit of Christ through act of believing participation.
Some hold that small children should be allowed to participate in the LordÕs Supper. They base this view on the old Passover feast in which the whole family participated, children included.
The historical reformed view rejects paedo-communion on the grounds of 1Cor. 11:29. What in this text would suggest that small children should not partake? _______________ [5]
Some people think it is permissible to serve themselves the LordÕs Supper in the privacy of their own home. What in 1Cor.11:17-22 suggests this to be inappropriate? See also 1Cor.10:17 ___________________________ [6]
Based on the Westminster Confession, Chapter 27, answer the following questions:
1. Of what are the sacraments the sign and seals? ______________________________________ [7]
2. Who instituted the sacraments?
________________________________________________ [8]
3. Who or what do the sacraments represent?
_______________________________________ [9]
4. On what does the efficacy of the sacraments depend?
_____________________________________ [10]
5. Who has the authority to administer the sacraments?
_____________________________ [11]
6. What relationship do the Old Testament sacraments have with those of the New Testament? ________________________ [12]
Those who liked this study may also like our other works by Smalling.
[1] Take into account the totality of biblical teaching as it may relate to the subject at hand.
[2] The Bible itself.
[3] There is only one correct interpretation of any verse. It can be deduced from the ordinary rules of interpretation.
[1] Find other texts in scripture that are clearer.
[2]
The Holy Spirit and
cleansing.
[3] Outpouring
[4] Zwingli was a Swiss reformer during the time of Luther. He and Luther had a dispute this point.
[5]
The person partaking
must be able to discern the LordÕs body in it. This means able to understand
what the elements represent, namely the sacrifice of Christ and his atonement
for sin. This requires a degree of mental conceptions beyond the level of small
children. Furthermore, the old Passover was celebrated in private homes, not in
congregational worship as in the New Testament. Therefore, that argument is invalid.
[6]
The LordÕs Supper is
also a celebration of the unity we have among believers in Christ, as one body.
In this we see a play on the word Òbody.Ó The bread not only represents the
physical body of Christ, it also represents the corpus of believers in him.
Therefore it is illogical, indeed contradictory, to partake of the LordÕs
Supper alone.
[7]
The covenant of grace
[8] Jesus
[9] Christ and his benefits
[10] The Holy Spirit
[11]
Ministers of the
gospel duly ordained.